Magomednabi Adilkhanov biography

Earlier, during a search in her apartment, the police took two pneumatic pistols, as well as “robbed” her car. The affairs of the robbery of the car and the assignment of two pneumatic pistols are associated with the murder of the son of Gulnara Bagautdinova - Vali Bagautdinov. He was killed by the security forces on November 1 on the Road of Buinaksk-Verkhny Gunib.

The investigation officially states that Bagautdinov was killed by return fire, but Gulnara proved for five years that her son and the car were shot separately, and the weapons from which he allegedly shot at the security forces was thrown to him. The evidence that, in the opinion of the “draft”, are essential, were given in the articles of our publication. For example, in the materials - “killed under fire”, “he went to live in London”, “setting up a shootout”.

In December, the Supreme Court of Dagestan terminated the criminal case against Bagautdinov in connection with his death, but found guilty of the shooting. Although, in the course of the trial, the employees of the PPS - supposedly participants in the shootout - several times changed their testimonies regarding the shooting, time and the situation of the incident. At first they claimed that they themselves shot at Bagautdinov, and this was confirmed by a official audit.

Then they admitted that they were not shooting, but by the employees of the Sobr. At one of the court hearings, they admitted that they did not shoot at all, that they were instructed to admit that they shot Bagautdinov, but could not remember who gave them such an instruction1. The time for the duty of these employees of the PPS is also diverging. One of them was on duty in the morning, someone C, and someone with the criminal case investigated at that time investigator Nadir Televov over a year checked the Kalashnikov assault rifles, from which the PPS employees allegedly shot.

And then it turned out, the machine guns were disposed of, since they all suddenly failed. Bagautdinov’s car at the special parking lot is isolated from the case on November 4, during a search in Gulnara Bagautdinova’s apartment in Makhachkala, the detective of the criminal investigation department of the Buinaksky District Department of Internal Affairs Abdul Jamava found two pneumatic pistols at it.

The possession and storage of pneumatic pistols is not a violation of the law, but ... Jamavov seized them without providing a bagautdin copy of the search protocol. Six months later, it turned out that he did not reflect in the protocol the detection and seizure of pistols, and the woman wrote a statement to law enforcement agencies on this subject. Since then, 15 refusals have been accepted to initiate a criminal case.

Tajibov demanded to consider the issue of initiating a criminal case against Jamavov on theft of pneumatic pistols and isolation of his police officer from society. In particular, the witnesses by A. Soltanmuradov and M. Gadzhiev began to deny the fact of the seizure by Jamavov pistols during a search in the Bagautdinova apartment. But in the case there are eight witnesses of how Jamavov seized the pistols and in five years they gave evidence four times.

And on March 4, the criminal prosecution against Dzhamavov was terminated in connection with his non -involvement. The investigation decided that the person subject to attract as the accused was not established; There is no real possibility of Jamavov’s participation in the case; The location of some suspect A. although Jamava at that time continued to remain in the status of the accused.

From this moment, the preliminary investigation has repeatedly suspended and resumed. The last document on the cancellation of the decision on the suspension of the preliminary investigation is dated June 25, in which and. Abdullaev once again raises questions about the confrontation of the witnesses A. that is, between those in whose testimony there are no contradictions. The investigation also intends to establish persons who, together with Bagautdinova, allegedly expressed threats to Saltanmuradov’s sister and also hold a confrontation between them.

Now they want to make me guilty in this story, ”Bagautdinova is indignant. And naturally, these witnesses are testified in favor of Jamavov. Moreover, they forced the sister of one of them to say that I came to the village of Babayurt with two men and she intimidated her on the market, that her brother should testify that I had pistols and Jamavs took them.

As if in fact it was not. ” At the same time, she claims that since the year investigators cannot establish witnesses and other officials who participated in the same search. However, Bagautdinova claims that both Damadov and Damadanov were during the search. But between them - Dzamavov, Damadanov and Bagautdinova - the investigation of the confrontation is not in a hurry. According to her, at the moment Damadanov does not work in law enforcement agencies, he took up the farm in the village of Kakashura.

Bagautdinova reminded that she has a video that she refused to attach as evidence. For this, he asked my friend to persuade me to shut up and not complain anywhere. She refused him. This visit is recorded by video surveillance cameras, ”she said.After that, they tried to return the pistols several times, but officially they didn’t do it, since she did not refuse her complaints.

The setting of a robbery about how the case is being investigated on the robbery of her Bagautdinova car at all, nothing is known for several years. The executed car of Bagautdinova was issued six months after the murder of his son, a jacket, boots, sunglasses, perfumes and audio equipment were stolen from it. When she wrote a statement on the fact of theft, then the “guilty” appeared - Makhach Salamov.

In total, it “hung” 40 thefts on it, but not this one. According to Bagautdinova, both operatives invited him to take theft of speakers and other objects, threatening him to let his hearing in the pre -trial detention center that he was a former police officer. Then A. Atakov was taken to the department, stolen was seized from the utility room in his household and transferred to Bagautdinova.

But it has not yet been established how his speakers turned out and where the rest of the stolen things went. In the testimony of attacks, it is admitted that he was not familiar with Salamov and did not acquire a subwoofer, columns from him. According to him, an operational employee of the Buinaksky District Department of Internal Affairs named Magomed came to his farm in Halimbekaul, he had previously been familiar with him in the theft case.

He and his colleague brought the equipment with him, ”the attacks reported in his testimony. The last time the new head of the Buinaksky District Department of Internal Affairs told Bagautdinova that the issue of the department employee, investigator Ainudin Mamaev, was being resolved, who for some reason did not find out where his colleagues got the speakers. A criminal case was opened against Azamat Magomedov and Magomed Magomedov for abuse of powers, but then it was canceled.

In these cases, investigators lost documents, I hardly found them in six months. The investigation was not renewed until the noise raised. They never notify what they suspended, excited, refused. This all lasts the tenth year. Apparently, they all think that I will forget about it. I do not need these pistols for a hundred years. This is a matter of principle! For so many years they have been pulled.

I will insist that the abducted property is officially returned to me and attracted the perpetrators, ”Bagautdinov does not lose hope for a fair outcome. In the case of Gasanguseynovs, also one police officer cannot recall the data of another police officer who informed him of the shooting in the vicinity of the Horo-Hinds. It is weak in this, but for the investigating organs this is enough for the matter to not move anywhere.

In the case of Gadzhiev, as we recall, it also turned out that while he was Abdulmumin Abubakar Rizwanov, were in the Makhachkala pre-trial detention center, it turned out to be miraculously that during this period they bought a house in the village of Swapshchensk region. It was officially established that there is no house of the defendants in the Gadzhiev case in the Tver region, and the mentioned is owned by other owners, but ...

a criminal case on the fact of falsification of the criminal case materials was not instituted.